Reasonable Salary Calculator

Reasonable Salary Calculator

Estimate a defensible W-2 salary for an S corp owner, by state, and see the payroll-tax vs. income-tax trade-off — including a custom salary/distribution split you enter.

Income vs. Distribution: You pay income tax on the S-Corp’s net profits reported on your Schedule K-1, whether you actually withdraw the cash or leave it in the business.The "Reasonable Salary" Rule: If you actively work in your S-Corp, the IRS requires you to pay yourself a reasonable W-2 salary before you can take tax-free distributions. Wages are subject to standard payroll taxes, while the rest can be pulled as distributions

Recommended reasonable salary
$0
Defensible range: $0 – $0
Taxes vs. keep-home by salary scenario
Total tax Keep-home
LowRecommendedHighCustom
Business details
The dropdown above is what drives the state tax math. This field is just a place to jot a reminder for yourself; it has no zip-code lookup and doesn't feed any formula.
Role & compensation
Illustrative national planning figure, not a comparable-wage study. Replace with BLS OES data or documented comparables for the client's actual role and locale.
Range assumptions
Leaves a minimum distribution so the business keeps working capital.
Fixed inputs, not a formula off the salary itself — Low/High scale the market-adjusted wage; only the cap depends on net income.
Custom scenario (enter your own)

* Estimates for planning discussion only — not tax advice or a substitute for a full return. Federal figures use 2026 IRS brackets and the 2026 Social Security wage base ($184,500). State figures use the latest published (2025) single-filer brackets applied to combined salary + distribution, with no state-specific standard deduction, exemption, or local/city tax, and exclude entity-level add-ons (e.g., California's S corp franchise tax and uncapped SDI payroll tax). QBI is modeled at a flat 20% with no phase-out. "Reasonable salary" has no statutory formula — the IRS applies a multi-factor facts-and-circumstances test (see Rev. Rul. 74-44 and Watson v. Commissioner). Use this alongside documented market-wage research for the client's actual role.